Film vs Industry? How ‘Dhurandhar’ Sparked a Bigger Conversation in Bollywood

Released amid doubts and loud criticism, Dhurandhar has surprised the industry with strong box office numbers and an even stronger public response, triggering debate on content, politics, and power structures within Bollywood.

Pic; social handle 

When Dhurandhar was announced, many in the film industry treated it with indifference. A director with only two films to his name was hardly seen as a game-changer in an ecosystem where reputation often takes years to build. According to available information, the early perception was clear: two films are not enough to shake Bollywood’s established order. Yet, the response to Dhurandhar has challenged that belief in a way few expected.

Within six days of its release, the film reportedly crossed ₹180 crore in India, and by the end of its first week, it was heading towards the ₹200 crore mark. Industry tracking trends indicate that its worldwide collection is moving steadily towards the ₹300 crore milestone, with further growth anticipated. What surprised trade analysts was not just the total numbers, but the consistency. The film’s fifth and sixth day collections were close to its opening day figures, a sign of sustained audience interest rather than a front-loaded performance.

From Numbers to Narrative

While box office figures often dominate headlines, Dhurandhar has become a talking point for reasons beyond revenue. The film’s content has drawn attention for addressing sensitive historical and political events through a cinematic lens. As per recent developments, this approach has divided opinion within the industry but found strong resonance among viewers.

Before release, the film faced what many observers described as negative publicity. Some commentators questioned the director’s experience, the film’s budget, and even the lead cast’s box office credibility. However, once audiences began watching the film, the conversation shifted. Instead of debating budgets and star power, discussions moved towards storytelling, realism, and intent.

Content Versus Comfort Zones

At the centre of the debate lies the film’s portrayal of real incidents. The narrative reportedly touches upon events such as gang conflicts, a major hijacking episode, and the Mumbai terror attacks of 26/11. These incidents are part of documented history, with official records, media coverage, and public memory supporting their authenticity. Still, the decision to depict them using real references and visual elements has unsettled sections of the industry.

Some critics argued that such depictions bring politics into cinema. Others countered that showing recorded events, already acknowledged by history, does not automatically turn a film into political propaganda. According to industry insiders, the discomfort seems less about factual accuracy and more about breaking an unwritten rule of selective storytelling.

Reactions Within Bollywood

The debate intensified after comments from a leading actor known for his work in spy-themed films. Initially, his public message congratulating the team was welcomed by fans, especially as many felt Bollywood’s top stars were silent despite the film’s success. The first part of his statement, which highlighted that stories, not stars, make cinema memorable, was widely appreciated.

However, the later remarks raised questions about the film’s political undertones and the responsibility of filmmakers. This shift in tone confused many viewers. Public response on social media reflected a sense of disappointment, with users questioning why factual storytelling was being labelled as problematic when similar themes had previously been explored without controversy.

Audience Voice and Industry Power

Interestingly, while debates raged within Bollywood, reports suggested that Dhurandhar was being well received even in neighbouring countries, including Pakistan. Several audience reaction videos circulating online showed viewers engaging positively with the film’s narrative. This contrast has led to a broader discussion: why is a film celebrated abroad but questioned so intensely at home?

Film trade observers believe the answer lies in the film’s disruptive potential. Dhurandhar challenges the long-standing hierarchy of Bollywood, where elite networks often decide what kind of cinema deserves support. Its success signals that audiences are willing to back strong content, even if it comes from outside established circles.

Impact on the Industry

As per current trends, the film’s performance could redraw assumptions about budgets, star dependency, and storytelling freedom. For years, there has been an unspoken divide between “mass” and “elite” cinema, often linked to language, class, and access. Dhurandhar appears to blur that divide, appealing to a wide audience without fitting neatly into existing categories.

Industry analysts suggest that attempts to discourage or over-criticise such films may have the opposite effect. Audience curiosity tends to grow when a film is surrounded by controversy, especially if viewers sense unfair treatment. This dynamic has already played out in the film’s strong weekend collections and word-of-mouth growth.

What Lies Ahead

With the weekend collections expected to remain strong, trade circles are watching closely to see how far Dhurandhar can go. Whether it stops at ₹400 crore or moves beyond remains uncertain. What is clearer, however, is that the film has ignited a larger conversation about who controls narratives in Hindi cinema and how much space is given to uncomfortable truths.

For Bollywood, Dhurandhar is more than a commercial success. It is a reminder that audiences are evolving, and so are their expectations. Ignoring that shift may no longer be an option.